Mmmh. Und warum muss ich jetzt libusb-0.1-4 installieren und nicht uld/x86_64/libsane-smfp.so.1.0.1? Ich will doch Ethernet und nicht USB 😳 Wie auch immer, ich habe es getan:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 | kubuntu@kubuntu:~/Downloads/uld$ sudo apt install libusb-0.1-4 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: libusb-0.1-4 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 82 not upgraded. Need to get 17.1 kB of archives. After this operation, 57.3 kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 libusb-0.1-4 amd64 2:0.1.12-31 [17.1 kB] Fetched 17.1 kB in 0s (86.4 kB/s) perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = "de:en_GB:en_US", LC_ALL = (unset), LANG = "de_DE.UTF-8" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Selecting previously unselected package libusb-0.1-4:amd64. (Reading database ... 182355 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../libusb-0.1-4_2%3a0.1.12-31_amd64.deb ... Unpacking libusb-0.1-4:amd64 (2:0.1.12-31) ... Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.27-3ubuntu1) ... Setting up libusb-0.1-4:amd64 (2:0.1.12-31) ... Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.27-3ubuntu1) ... |
Und export SANE_DEBUG_DLL=255 && scanimage -L sieht auch vielversprechend aus:
1 2 3 4 5 | searching backend `smfp' in `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sane' [dll] load: trying to load `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sane/libsane-smfp.so.1' [dll] load: dlopen()ing `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sane/libsane-smfp.so.1' [dll] init: initializing backend `smfp' [dll] init: backend `smfp' is version 1.0.1 |
Skanlite findet nun auch den Scanner, nur das Ergebnis ist im Vergleich zu Scan an FTP unvollstaendig, s. unterer Rand im Anhang. 😢
Da es also nicht an Kubuntu 16.04 liegt, muss es entweder an meiner persoenlichen Unfaehigkeit liegen oder an Samsung?